Quality Management
At the beginning of March 2016, the Carinthia University of Applied Sciences received the certification document for its quality management system.
The quality management system (QMS) was examined by the evaluation agency evalag (Baden-Württemberg) in the context of a comprehensive audit procedure in 2015. Five experts from the higher education sector in Austria, Germany and Denmark convinced themselves during a two-day on-site visit of the efficiency of CUAS with regard to its strategy and development plan, quality assurance for studies & teaching, research & development, internationalisation, personnel and further education as well as of the information systems necessary for quality development. The excellent support provided by the service-oriented administration and the distinctive quality culture at the university were also rated positively.
For the further development of the QMS, the team of experts made valuable recommendations which will be incorporated into the continuous development of the university and the QMS in the coming years.
The certification is valid for the next seven years.
Das Qualitätsmanagementsystem (QMS) wurde im Rahmen eines umfassenden Auditverfahrens im Jahr 2022 von fünf Gutachter*innen aus dem Hochschulsektor in Österreich, Deutschland und der Schweiz überprüft. Im Fokus standen die Leistungsfähigkeit der FH Kärnten in Bezug auf ihre Strategie und ihren Entwicklungsplan, die Qualitätssicherung für Studium & Lehre, Forschung & Entwicklung, Internationalisierung, Personal und Weiterbildung sowie die für eine Qualitäts(weiter)entwicklung notwendigen Informations- und Kommunikationssysteme.
Die Gutachter*innen attestieren der FH Kärnten ein in allen Bereichen sehr gut entwickeltes Qualitätsmanagementsystem, das die Hochschule im Rahmen der Selbststeuerung bei der Erreichung der strategischen Ziele unterstützt. Zudem konnten die Gutachter*innen feststellen, dass die strategischen Ziele der Hochschule mit ihrem Leitbild in Einklang stehen und dass der rollierende und stark partizipativ gestaltete Strategieentwicklungsprozess sehr gut funktioniert. Besonders hervorgehoben wurden die gelebte Qualitätskultur und das deutliche Engagement der Hochschulangehörigen, das von einer starken Identifikation mit der Hochschule zeugt.
Für die weitere Entwicklung des QMS wurden vom Gutachter*innenteam wertvolle Empfehlungen ausgesprochen, die in kontinuierlichen Verbesserungsprozessen der gesamten Hochschule und des Qualitätsmanagements Berücksichtigung finden werden.
Download Audit-Zertifizierungsurkunde 2023
Download Auditbericht 2023
f.l.: Marianne Frick (Head of quality management & organisational development) und Susanne Dungs (Project responsibility) are happy about the successful certification.
f.l.: Rektor Peter Granig,Project group Claudia Palank, Marianne Frick, Eva Bstieler, Susanne Dungs, Franz Riemelmoser, Executive Director Siegfried Spanz (not on the picture: Christina Staubman, Kai Brauer, Thomas Walter).
- Participation and communication: The quality strategy of CUAS is based on the understanding of a quality culture that considers participation and communication as essential principles of quality development.
- Design of free spaces: As a learning organisation that is supported by the know-how of its members, the UAS Carinthia wants to create sufficient free spaces for creativity and innovation in its management to enable development.
- Structures for shaping a critical discourse: Quality management serves to stimulate and control a critical discourse and to provide a framework for it.
- Process orientation and transparency: The framework established by the quality management system provides orientation and guarantees the transparency of processes in the sense of an agreed knowledge of the procedures.
- Goal-oriented control: At the same time, the control of continuous quality development in the individual service areas is systematised.
The higher education development plan with the quality objectives set out therein, the organisational structure and the effectiveness of the quality culture shall form the basis for planning and the resulting implementation measures. Process and project management methods support the implementation.
The definition of what is meant by good quality is carried out in the individual performance and cross-sectional areas. Appropriate evaluation procedures are used to collect and analyse systematic and well-founded information on improvement, further development and renewal in order to continuously develop the university. Evaluation procedures have been established for each area of performance (study and teaching, research and development, university continuing education) as well as for the cross-sectional areas of internationalisation and human resources.
The respective responsible committees and functional areas of the university develop improvement measures based on the quality results. The quality cycle takes place at all levels (university level, level of the study areas or study programs and the service areas) of the university as well as in interaction between the areas. The quality culture also involves working groups and staff in the principle of goal-oriented quality development. Quality is created within the sphere of action of each member of the university.
Guidelines and processes provide orientation. Support processes as well as the infrastructure support the university in its value creation. They are continuously updated and improved.
Questions
Survey of graduates
As part of its internal quality assurance, the Carinthia University of Applied Sciences conducts graduate surveys at regular intervals. All graduates are invited twice to take part in the survey. The first survey takes place approximately one year after graduation, the second four years after graduation.
While the initial survey serves mainly to improve the quality of the study conditions against the background of the phase of career entry, the repeat survey offers valuable insights regarding the preparation of the students of our university for the professional requirements.
Objective and method
The aim of the graduate survey is to provide a retrospective assessment of the curriculum from the graduates' perspective. The results are incorporated into the annual reflection on the continuous development of the study programs.
The following topics are surveyed:
- Retrospective evaluation of general conditions as well as the competence acquisition of the study program in general
- Professional situation and retrospective assessment of competence acquisition in the specific context of the profession
- Further training and assessment of the usefulness of the acquired qualification
- Qualitative information on strengths and weaknesses of the study program or university
Details of the survey
The aim of the graduate survey is to provide a retrospective assessment of the curriculum from the perspective of the graduates. The results are incorporated into the annual reflection on the continuous development of the study programs.
The survey is designed in two waves. The first wave takes place one year after graduation. The survey of the final year 2014 was conducted online from 27.04.2016 to 31.05.2016. The response rate was 24%.
The following topics were surveyed:
- Competence acquisition of the study program in general as well as the retrospective evaluation of the general conditions
- Retrospective assessment of competence acquisition & professional situation in the specific context of the profession
- Further training and assessment of the usefulness of the acquired qualification
- Qualitative information on strengths and weaknesses of the study program or university
- We would like to thank all participants and attendees!
Results
In retrospect, 82% of the graduates rated their studies positively. 28% were very satisfied, 54% were satisfied with the completed studies. Compared to previous years, the proportion of satisfied graduates has increased slightly.
Evaluation of the studies
With regard to the general conditions, the retrospective satisfaction with the library, the ICT services, the student workplaces on campus and the support provided by teachers and student administration was surveyed. As in previous years, the ICT services as well as the support provided by teachers and student administration were rated very positively. Potential for improvement was reported with regard to the library and the student workplaces on campus. With regard to teaching, the up-to-dateness of the teaching content was particularly emphasised. In retrospect, the graduates were somewhat less satisfied with the theory/practice transfer and the teaching of scientific skills. The overall satisfaction of the graduates with the acquired knowledge was 85 %.
In order to evaluate the choice of study program, it was asked whether the study program would be chosen again or recommended to others. About 85 % of the graduates would study again. 73 % would choose their course of study again. 78 % would choose the university again. In the qualitative feedback, the criteria "curriculum/study programme", "FH structure", "teaching staff", "career opportunities" and "place of study" were given as reasons for the re-election. Reasons against a re-election were also mainly "job opportunities", "curriculum/study programme" and "teaching staff".
Career entry and admission to further studies
The average time between graduation and the start of employment was four months. 70% of the graduates with a job have a permanent position. Across all fields of study, 92% of the graduates remain in Austria. 76 % of the persons working in Austria work in Carinthia.
For about 51% of the graduates, the acquired degree was a prerequisite for the current professional position. 41% of the currently employed graduates stated that their professional activity had a strong connection to their studies. Overall, 68% of the graduates were satisfied or very satisfied with the knowledge they had acquired with regard to their professional activities.
Two thirds of the bachelor's graduates took up further studies after graduation, usually a master's degree course. Most of the graduates found the degree they had acquired to be useful for their further studies.
Accreditation
The Carinthia University of Applied Sciences was granted an unlimited accreditation by the AQ (Agency for Quality Assurance and Accreditation Austria) on 9 May 2012 in accordance with § 23 of the University Quality Assurance Act, Federal Law Gazette I No. 74/2011.
Here you will find the publications of the accreditation procedures of CUAS from May 2012:
- Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen"
- Ergebnisbericht zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen"
- Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Verfahrenstechnik"
- Ergebnisbericht zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Verfahrenstechnik"
- Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Masterstudiengangs "Industrial Engineering & Management"
- Ergebnisbericht zur Akkreditierung des FH-Masterstudiengangs "Industrial Engineering & Management"
- Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Masterstudiengangs "Business Development & Management"
- Ergebnisbericht zur Akkreditierung des FH-Masterstudiengangs "Business Development & Management"
- Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Nachhaltige Immobilien- und Infrastrukturentwicklung"
- Stellungnahme zum Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Nachhaltige Immobilien- und Infrastrukturentwicklung"
- Ergebnisbericht zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Nachhaltige Immobilien- und Infrastrukturentwicklung"
- Gutachten zum Verfahren zur Abänderung des Akkreditierungsbescheids des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Nachhaltige Immobilien- und Infrastrukturentwicklung"
- Ergebnisbericht zum Verfahren zur Abänderung des Akkreditierungsbescheids des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Nachhaltige Immobilien- und Infrastrukturentwicklung"
- Ergebnisbericht zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege"
- Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege"
- Stellungnahme zum Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege"
- Ergebnisbericht zur Akkreditierung des FH-Masterstudiengangs "Digital Transformation Management"
- Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Masterstudiengangs "Digital Transformation Management"
- Stellungnahme zum Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Masterstudiengangs "Digital Transformation Management"
- Ergebnisbericht zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Informationstechnologien"
- Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Informationstechnologien"
- Stellungnahme zum Gutachten zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs "Informationstechnologien"
- Ergebnisbericht zur Akkreditierung des FH-Bachelorstudiengangs „Informationstechnologien – Joint Degree“
Team
MMag. Eva Bstieler
Management
+43 5 90500 7020
e.bstieler[at]fh-kaernten[dot]at
Eva Maria Beichler, BSc MSc
+43 5 90500 7027
e.beichler[at]fh-kaernten[dot]at
Alena Gugganig
+43 5 90500 7024
a.gugganig[at]fh-kaernten[dot]at
Mag. Kathrin Pobegen, Bakk.
+43 5 90500 7028
k.pobegen[at]fh-kaernten[dot]at
Dr. Cornelia Mayr
+43 5 90500 7023
c.mayr[at]fh-kaernten[dot]at
Mag. Olivia Orsolya Schütz, MA
(currently on maternity leave)
+43 5 90500 7022
o.schuetz[at]fh-kaernten[dot]at
Mag. Dr. Katharina Ninaus
(derzeit in Karenz)
+43 5 90500 7026
k.ninaus[at]fh-kaernten[dot]at